Tekijä: | Carr, S. Mak, Y. T. Needham, J. E. |
Otsikko: | Differences in strategy, quality management practices and performance reporting systems between ISO accredited and non-ISO accredited companies |
Lehti: | Journal of World Trade
1997 : OCT, VOL. 31:5, p. 383-403 |
Asiasana: | STANDARDS COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE CORPORATE STRATEGY STOCHASTIC GAMES PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REPORTING |
Kieli: | eng |
Tiivistelmä: | This research compares the business strategy, quality management practices and performance reporting systems of New Zealand manufacturing companies which have ISO accreditation with those of non-ISO accredited companies. It was found that companies pursuing a quality strategy are more likely to have ISO accreditation. There was inconclusive support for the hypothesis relating to the differences between quality management practices of ISO and non-ISO accredited companies. Overall, the results suggest that ISO accredation does not necessarily result in the increased adoption of quality management practices. |
SCIMA