haku: @author Sockell, D. / yhteensä: 3
viite: 1 / 3
« edellinen | seuraava »
| Tekijä: | Delaney, J. T. Sockell, D. |
| Otsikko: | The mandatory-permissive distinction and collective bargaining outcomes. |
| Lehti: | Industrial and Labor Relations Review
1989 : VOL. 42:4, p. 566-583 |
| Asiasana: | COLLECTIVE BARGAINING INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS USA |
| Kieli: | eng |
| Tiivistelmä: | Union contract and laboratory experiment data are used to assess whether the distinction between mandatory and permissive bargaining subjects affects collective bargaining outcomes. In general, the findings suggest that the distinction has an impact. The contract analysis suggests that bargaining differs across contracts that include permissive items and contracts that exclude permissive items. Further, an analysis of the potential impact of the distinction in a controlled setting indicates that unions negotiate less favourable nonwage bargaining outcomes when an issue's legal status is permissive or unknown than when is mandatory. This evidence will probably encourage policy makers to judge the distinction using empirical test. |
« edellinen | seuraava »
SCIMA