haku: @freeterm law / yhteensä: 4
viite: 3 / 4
| Tekijä: | Skrk, M. |
| Otsikko: | Slovene views on the succession of states |
| Lehti: | Pravnik
1996 : VOL. 51:(1-3), p. 45-71 |
| Asiasana: | |
| Vapaa asiasana: | Slovenia, Yugoslavia, succession, citizenship, rights, property, debts, pensions, archives, international contracts, international organizations, membership, legal aspect, international law |
| Kieli: | slv |
| Tiivistelmä: | The particularity of dissolution of the former SFRY lies in the fact that its successor States haven't reached consensus on the fundamental State succession issues as it was the case in the former SU and in the Czech and Slovak Federation.Namely, one of the successor States of the former SFRY, i.e.FRY (Serbia and Montenegro), claims for itself the position of the predecessor State.Therefore, at the negotiations between the successor States of the former SFRY, it has been impossible to come to an agreement on the succession issues such as, inter alia, the definition of State property, the inventory of this property and the key of distribution of assets and liabilities of the former SFRY.Slovenia holds the position that these negotiations are based on the international law of State succession, including the two Vienna conventions on the succession of States of 1978 and 1983.The aim of the Opinions of the Arbitration Commission of the ICFY is to give interpretation of individual matters of succession of States.Due to inconsistency in respect of the implementation of the relevant resolutions of the Security Council and the General Assembly of the UN, which confirmed the fact that former SFRY had ceased to exist, the question of membership of the former SFRY in the UN has remained unsolved.This additionally complicates the succession of States of the former SFRY. |
SCIMA