haku: @author Iselin, E. R. / yhteensä: 5
viite: 4 / 5
Tekijä:Iselin, E. R.
Otsikko:Individual versus group decision-making performance: A further investigation of two theories in a bankruptcy prediction task
Lehti:Journal of Business Finance and Accounting
1990 : JAN, VOL. 18:2, p.191-208
Asiasana:DECISION MAKING
GROUP DECISION MAKING
BANKRUPTCY
FINANCIAL FORECASTING
THEORIES
Kieli:eng
Tiivistelmä:Two theories about the relative performance of composites and interacting groups in financial decision making are investigated. A composite decision is the mean decision of a set of individuals who do not interact. The two theories are the expertise theory and the information load theory. The expertise theory proposes that under certain conditions, interacting groups containing diverse expertise will outperform composites and interacting groups with homogeneous expertise. The information load theory proposes that interacting groups perform better than composites under conditions of high load. An investigation of the empirical tests of these theories reveals that they are problematic.
SCIMA tietueen numero: 92106
lisää koriin
SCIMA