haku: @indexterm contingent valuation / yhteensä: 60
viite: 13 / 60
Tekijä:Blumenschein, K. (et al.)
Otsikko:Eliciting willingness to pay without bias: Evidence from a field experiment
Lehti:Economic Journal
2008 : JAN, VOL. 118:525, p. 114-137
Asiasana:USA
contingent valuation
Vapaa asiasana:willingness to pay
Kieli:eng
Tiivistelmä:Hypothetical willingness to pay (WTP) questions are supposed to overestimate real WTP. Two methods of removing hypothetical bias (hereafter as: h-b.) are compared with real purchases: i. a cheap talk approach and ii. a certainty approach. There is found evidence of h-b. for plain contingent valuation (here as: c-v). C-v. with certainty statements removes the h-b., but the i. approach has no significant impact. It is suggested that WTP could be accurately estimated by adding a simple follow-up question about the certainty of responses and that i. approach is not a generally effective one.
SCIMA tietueen numero: 269638
lisää koriin
SCIMA