haku: @freeterm ownership / yhteensä: 84
viite: 28 / 84
| Tekijä: | Burkart, M. Lee, S. |
| Otsikko: | One share - one vote: the theory |
| Lehti: | Review of finance
2008 : VOL. 12:1, p. 1-49 |
| Asiasana: | finance voting shares corporate governance theories |
| Vapaa asiasana: | ownership |
| Kieli: | eng |
| Tiivistelmä: | There are three questions around which the theoretical literature on security-voting structure can be organized: i. What impact do non-voting shares have on takeover outcomes?, ii. How does disproportional voting power affect the incentives of blockholders?, iii. What are the repercussions of mandating one share - one vote (here as: 1-s-1-v.) for firms' financing and ownership choices? In general, the costs and benefits of separating cash flow and votes reflect the fundamental governance trade-off btw. empowering managers and disempowering blockholders. Hence, it is an open question whether mandating 1-s-1-v. would improve the quality of corporate governance etc. |
SCIMA